Trans-European Division Responds to Brexit Vote
From ANN and Trans-European Division, June 30, 2016 On June 23 the British people voted by a margin of 3.8 percent to leave the European Union. With a turnout of 72 percent, 51.9 percent of the electorate made the historic decision, changing 43 years of European history since the United Kingdom joined the European Community in 1973.
Following the exit vote, Trans-European Division (TED) stewardship director, David Neal, noted, “The honest, Bible believing Adventist is conflicted. For sure, the prophetic word stands. But neither can he/she be ready and willing to stand with those who are fearful of ‘the other’, whose actions in word and deed border on zenophobia. As valid as Daniel 2 is, without question, Christ’s parable of the Good Samaritan is of equal consideration. The Brexit campaign completely ignored this value.”
In an impassioned plea, Sweeney, whose parents were themselves migrants in the 1970’s, stated, “Europe will always be divided in one way or another, however, we have a Christian responsibility to show our love for all people who in political debates are depersonalized and labelled as ‘migrants’, ‘economic refugees’ etc. We may not share the language, culture, or ethnicity. However, every man woman and child are our brothers and sisters who Christ loves and died to save.”
“As officers, we are studying the implications that this vote will have on the operation of the TED Office in achieving our mission in Europe,” stated TED president, Raafat Kamal (pictured here leading a discussing during the division’s 2016 Spring Meetings). “There will be clearly financial and operational implications for us to consider.”
He equally notes that the TED is not just multi-lingual but multi-currency.
“The composition of Europe has changed over the years both inside and outside the church. The two European Divisions have equally changed several times in terms of size and structure during their history. Change of itself is not a problem. We must simply find the best way to react to the change.” He noted, “It may even be that in such times of uncertainty people may look more to faith based solutions – a security that as Adventists we can certainly provide.”
The uncertainty within the various financial markets may cause some issues for the mission of the Church, states Nenad Jepuranovic, TED Treasurer. He sees the biggest financial risk as the fluctuating exchange rate between the 12 different currencies used in the 22 countries that make up the TED.
“Over the past few years, our tithe income in local currencies has been steadily increasing,” Jepuranovic noted. “However, the economic turbulence in the European markets in the last two years, has meant that we have borne the brunt of adverse exchange rates that have reduced our tithe income in UK£ by 9.6%.” This has been balanced in part by US/UK exchange rates.
What of the future? “The latest predictions for the European markets are at best uncertain, but over the past few years the TED has built up sufficient reserves to cover economically volatile periods such as those that we may encounter in the next few months.” Nevertheless, Jepuranovic is searching for ways to “improve our efficiency and effectiveness to best serve the needs of our territory.”
Retiring shortly as treasurer for the Church in the UK & Ireland, Victor Pilmoor finds himself concerned with the issues of fraternity. Writing in his monthly blog he states, “Whether one looks at the goal of inclusiveness among the nations of Europe, the freedom of party goers in Orlando, and good will in the Yorkshire town of Batley [where a minister of parliament campaigning for ‘remain’ was cold-bloodedly murdered], our societies are clearly fragmented. The arguments that rage, dwell on fear and the forces of self-interest.”
This, he notes has led to, “a loss of fraternity, an unwillingness by many in society to take the abundant view that there is room for all of us, that life is not a game of winners and losers.” He adds that, “uncompromising fear-ridden fundamentalism has filled the hearts of many to the point where self-preservation has become the object of national and religious influence.”
He concludes with, “By contrast we could offer a world view that acknowledges the generosity of God offering grace and sustenance for all. A perspective that our lives are to honor what God gives us, to steward the abilities and powers with which we are endowed for purposes greater than ourselves.”
