Northern California Delegates Vote Not to Debate Resolutions
by Monte Sahlin
By AT News Team, June 2, 2014
Three potentially controversial resolutions were on the agenda for the delegates to the May 18 constituency session of the Northern California Conference (NCC) of the Seventh-day Adventist denomination. To the surprise of some, the delegates voted not to consider the proposed resolutions, referring the agenda items to the conference executive committee for possible study, reported local newspapers.
The three proposed resolutions were on topics currently being discussed by Adventists around the world: evolution, sexuality and whether clergy ordination should be extended to women employed as pastors as it has been in China, two union conferences in North America and a number of places in Europe. The proposed texts were distributed to delegates in advance in a package of constituency meeting reports and materials.
The proposed resolution on evolution stated that the NCC would "register strong disapproval of any employee, ministry or institution supported by its tithes and/or offerings which (1) does not teach, promote and full support the official [denominational] belief in creation; and (2) promotes the Darwinian model of natural origins (in theistic or other evolutionary theories) as a factual explanation for the origin of the natural world."
The proposed resolution on sexuality focused on homosexuality, suggesting that delegates "register unqualified disapproval of any employee, ministry or institution … (1) which favors, endorses or suggests the acceptance into church membership or employment individuals engaged in homosexual practice; and (2) fails to actively seek to restore [such] individuals to transformed, victorious lives according to God's original design." There was no definition of this final phrase, although it evidently was intend to mean celibacy on the part of church members with an LGBTI identity.
The proposed resolution on ordination directed the NCC to "refrain from pastoral ordination … without respect to gender … until such time as the Delegates of the General Conference of Seventh-day Adventists … approve a bylaw, policy, rule or regulation which allows for such ordination." In other words, discrimination against women serving in pastoral ministry would have to be maintained.
All three proposals were submitted by Pastor Larre Kostenko on behalf of three local churches in the foothills of the Sierra Nevada mountain range north of Sacramento. The Oroville Church has 268 members. The Brownsville Church has 100 members. The Golden Feather Church in Yankee Hill has 57 members. Kostenko is currently listed as the pastor of two of these churches and the third has no pastor currently named.
The meeting was uneventful. Pastor Jim Pedersen, who has served as conference president for four years was re-elected "virtually unanimously," according to local newspapers. This will be his third two-year term in office. The proposed resolutions were quickly disposed of without debate.
The NCC is one of four conferences in the U.S. State of California. It includes 140 congregations with a total of more than 40,000 members in 30 counties north of the San Francisco Bay Area.
"There are undoubtedly others who want denominational units to take a strong position on these issues," a retired church administrator told Adventist Today. "This event makes it clear that a strong majority of the pastors and the lay leaders in local churches are not interested in this kind of controversy because the conflict results in members dropping out, reducing their involvement and support, and the younger generations being turned off about Adventist faith in general."
I have been a delegate before to constituency sessions of the NCCSDA, and hot topics were usually defered to the executive committee. My guess, if this had been opened up for a discussion from the floor there would have been a lot of heated rhetoric. These sessions are usually very boring.
This reference to return to committee the three "hot" topics, are in itself an indication of division even in a small contitutency of less than 500 members. Ten years ago this would have been voted in.
"Returned to committe for study" is trite phrase used to mean "it's been tabled for some indefinite time in the future." Just like WO which for many decades has been passed on to later committees for more study, it's been the most studied question in SdA history and who doubts that it may be a continuing study when Christ comes?
If we believe that the Godhead want to restore Their church (the earthly court of the Sanctuary where all the believers serve as ambassadors and priests unto our heavenly King and High Priest), and if we believe that the Godhead want to restore Their church before the Second Advent, then arguably the restoration of women to full partnership with men as earthly ambassadors and priests is absolutely essential.
I'd appreciate clarification from the author of his use of the quotation, "This event makes it clear that a strong majority (emphases supplied) of the pastors and the lay leaders in local churches are not interested in this kind of controversy…" How could a close vote of 52-48% (some believe it was actually 252-248, which would be less than 1% difference) be a strong majority? (…Tho, I see you hadn't mentioned the close vote in the article.) The vote to refer the resolutions to the NCC Executive Committee was taken in irregular, confusing circumstances: the resolutions hadn't been introduced or read out loud to the delegates. Some delegates said they hadn't read them beforehand–they were totally in the dark. So this vote can't be a clear indication of the delegates' or constituents' beliefs, nor their willingness to grapple together with these serious issues or "controversy," as above. Other than the last paragraph, I appreciate your straightforward reporting of the issues & event .
It's the tradition SNAFU.
I am a adventist from birth. 26 years now. SO MANY BAD THINGS HAPPENING, AND IT SEEMS AS ADVENTIST MEMBERS ARE WINDING UP WITH THE CORRUPTION. Well, nothing will be better until the universal Judgment. We all know the bible, yet we do what we feel!!!! If adventist is the remenant church, then we all should be againstnt, all corruption. If we are truely baptize, We should walk different, talk different, dress different etc. And dont boast and bragg of the good we do. Thats what the internet is doing. Bragging what Adventist do etc. We should shine our light yes!! BUT WE TALK MORE AND DO LESS.
Is that the particular pre-Advent investigative jugdment or the general universal judgment?
In what sense do members of the church believe that their "tithes and offering" are gifts to God when they are given to the church? If one does not approve of what the church does with the gifts, why not give instead to something one considers more godly (direct investment in people, for example). There seems to be a certain level of laziness in letting the church decide where your money should go. It is a little like paying taxes instead of donating to specific charities or people. Wouldn't a "tithe strike" be in order?