by AT News Team

The officers of the General Conference (GC) have issued a statement this week labeling the vote of the Columbia Union Conference constituency session on July 29 to ordain women pastors “a serious threat to the unity of the worldwide Seventh-day Adventist Church” and “very disappointing to the senior leaders of the worldwide church.” GC President Ted Wilson appeared at the session and appealed to the delegates not to take the action which later in the day more than 80 percent voted. It was the second time this year that a union conference constituency has voted to extend ordination to women, a step which the Adventist Church in China took in the 1980s.
 
The statement is similar to a letter circulated in advance of the July 29 meeting and again appeals to union conferences around the world to wait until the GC completes a study of ordination which was announced by Wilson at the 2010 GC Session. It does go further in stating specifically that the action voted by the Columbia Union delegates is “not in harmony with General Conference Working Policy.” This is a controversial position because many church historians and experts on denominational policy have pointed out that the Working Policy does assign the approval of ordinations to union conferences and does not include a specific policy prohibiting the ordination of women to the gospel ministry.
 
The primary reason for this statement is likely not to re-state what the GC officers have said earlier. It is aimed at the Pacific Union Conference constituency delegates that will assemble August 19 to consider the same issue. It is likely that this statement is an attempt by the GC officers to convince the delegates in the Pacific Union Conference to vote against the ordination of women.
 
“The real issue here is the exercise of leadership,” one retired denominational administrator told Adventist Today. “The GC leaders have muddled through this issue for decades and everyone is losing patience.” A retired missionary said, “the concern is that in some parts of Africa and Latin America there will be a significant number of members leaving the Adventist Church if women are ordained. If that were to happen, the growth of the church in some areas could be slowed down.”
 
The GC Session of 1881 voted a resolution permitting the ordination of women, but it was never implemented for reasons that remain unclear. In the 1950s the issue was again discussed by the GC leadership which led to a number of studies similar to the current one and an indecisive vote at the 1990 GC Session which declared that there was no reason in Scripture or the writings of Ellen White to prohibit the practice and decided not to move ahead with it because of concerns about “unity.”
 
The statement in full is as follows:
 
“The unity among disciples for which Jesus prayed is a precious gift of God:  this gift must be continually nurtured and is a never-ending and often difficult task of those gathered in His name.  Thus the apostolic church could engage in vigorous discussion and even robust disagreement with the assurance that each member’s personal surrender to the Spirit would result in a God-honoring resolution to the challenges and conflicts so that the essential unity of the church was preserved and extended (Acts 15:1-29).  Disagreement in such a community of faith is neither fatal nor schismatic, for each believer accepts the responsibility to fulfill the prayer of Jesus by acting and speaking to preserve the unity He expected as indicated in John 17.
 
“Unilateralism—the premise that one individual or one group may pursue its vision of truth at the expense of the unity of the whole—was and is the great adversary of the unified Body of Christ.  It ruptures the essential bond which brings people from everywhere into the remnant church, tempting them to prefer one truth above the higher and collective requirement to act in concert with each other.
 
“Appealing for a serious recommitment to the principle of church unity, the officers of the General Conference and the division presidents issued a call for restraint in their consensus statement of June 29, 2012, “An Appeal for Unity in Respect to Ministerial Ordination Practices”.  Fully aware that significant differences exist regarding the theology of ordination and the appropriateness of ordaining women to the gospel ministry, they nonetheless urged all entities and individuals in the church to respect current Church policy and General Conference Session decisions, and to work harmoniously through the process established by the General Conference Executive Committee in October 2011.  That action established a worldwide three-year study and discussion process culminating with a Theology of Ordination Study Committee which will review all aspects of the practice of ministerial ordination in the Seventh-day Adventist Church including the ordination of women to the gospel ministry, with reports provided to the October 2014 Annual Council meeting of the Executive Committee.  This would allow any agreed-upon resolutions to be placed on the agenda of the 2015 General Conference Session, the body accepted by church entities and affirmed by the divinely-inspired counsel of the Spirit of Prophecy to be the official voice and the highest ecclesiastical authority of the church.  The General Conference Executive Committee, the highest deliberative authority of the worldwide church between General Conference Sessions, includes nearly 120 union conference and union mission presidents as voting delegates, along with elected officers, departmental directors, pastors, frontline employees and numerous laypersons.
 
“It was thus very disappointing to the senior leaders of the worldwide church to learn of the unilateral action taken by the delegates of the Columbia Union Conference at a special constituency meeting on July 29, 2012.  That action is not in harmony with General Conference Working Policy—the collective decisions of world leadership that define the operating procedures and relationships applicable to all organizations.  Further, the action sets aside the 1990 and 1995 decisions of the General Conference in Session respecting the practice of ordination.  It pre-empts the process voted by the General Conference Executive Committee for the current study of ordination theology and practices by committing the Columbia Union Conference to a particular outcome before the study-and-discussion process is completed.  In so doing, it asserts the right of one entity to place its conclusions above the principle of unity in the Body of Christ. By this action, the delegates have allowed for a principle of unilateralism and autonomy throughout their territory that can only be disruptive to the harmonious functioning of the Columbia Union Conference, as well as to that union’s relationship with the world church family.  Unfortunately, some conferences, congregations, and individuals may try now to incorrectly cite the example of the Columbia Union Conference itself as justification for pursuing any independent course of action.  It is possible that some who voted for the resolution on July 29 may not have fully understood the danger their action poses to the functional unity of their own region and to the wider denomination.
 
“The action taken by the Columbia Union Conference represents a serious threat to the unity of the worldwide Seventh-day Adventist Church, and thus, at its next meeting in October 2012, the General Conference Executive Committee will carefully review the situation and determine how to respond.  In the Spirit of our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ, the officers of the General Conference and the division presidents again appeal to all entities, organizations, and individuals, including the Columbia Union Conference, to refrain from independent and unilateral decisions and implementing actions on issues affecting ministerial ordination, and to invest their energies and creativity in fostering a vigorous dialogue through the established process about how the Church should recognize and affirm the gifts of the Spirit in the lives and ministry of believers.
 
“An important companion document, organized as a series of questions and answers about key assumptions, assertions and historical backgrounds discussed at the recent Columbia Union Conference constituency meeting or in related communication, will be available approximately Wednesday, August 8, through the media outlets of the General Conference.”